Leo M.J. Aurini

Trained as a Historian at McMaster University, and as an Infantry soldier in the Canadian Forces, I'm a Scholar, Author, Film Maker, and a God fearing Catholic, who loves women for their illogical nature.

8 Responses

  1. Jeremy says:

    I’ve not yet tried to seriously argue with a feminist. However, I usually see through poor arguments quickly so maybe I have been de-selecting them as worthy opponents before starting an argument.

    As for video games. For most of my own history playing them, I held onto a small figment of guilt while playing them. I felt as though they were wasting my time, that I was getting nothing from them.

    The reality is that playing video games is as close to a regular dose of calm zen time that many people ever get. It took watching a modern day philosopher use his youtube channel to show himself playing a modern FPS to make me realize this. You shouldn’t be playing video games if they make you frustrated and angry. You should be playing the occasional game if it helps you turn off parts of your brain that would otherwise be difficult to turn off (this is the case for me).

  2. Thanatos says:

    I believe “Feminist Frequency” is the startup of Anita Sarkeesian, the fem-wit who gamed 150 grand on some false “discrimination” charge.

  3. handbanana says:

    it really is like wrestling with a pig.

  4. Realist says:

    Hi Aurini,

    Fantastic videos.

    Just a heads-up; This one seems to have broken the Naomi person’s hamster wheel – she deleted all of her content and made a “leaving Youtube” video three days after you released it!

    Cognitive dissonance?

    Ed: Oh, is all the libel she wrote about me gone from the Internet? I hope so. Koanic Soul thinks that her new, paleo diet might be improving her cognition; I certainly hope so.

  5. Karl says:

    Another great presentation Comrade Aurini. And thank you for referring us to the other YouTuber as well.

    Maybe a future video can explain why we Americans have to turn to our comrades in Canada to get the real story. Ay?

    Ed: Best theory? We’re more right-wing in Canada – comes with the winter – despite ostensive socialism and overwhelming FeelCrime Legislation, most Canadians are basically right-wing – but with a “heart” ergo socialism.

    Also: no guilt over slavery (though they’re trying to engender it…).

  6. Dr. Faust says:

    Feminist are as insane as conspiracy theorist. The more radical the more insane they’ll be. They become obsessed with their world view. They see the patriarchy everywhere. This is the reason why they’re miserable. It’s not something they can change about themselves. It’s someone else’s fault. I am honestly more terrified of feminism than I am of Islam. They can’t be reasoned with and they are organized. They are zealots who believe in their invisible monsters. I literally heard a feminist tell me that the patriarchy was invisible and that men brought it with them wherever they went. Women had no power at all. None. But somehow managed to overthrow the patriarchy – or parts of it – with a complete lack of power. Amazing. The contradiction in that never dawns on them. I’m a pessimist. Radical feminism is just going to be normalized soon. H. Clinton will see to that. We have gone so far beyond point of sanity. If you’ve ever slept with a BPD girl you know the dangers of crazy women. Western Civilization has effectively stuck their collective dicks into a nest of crazy.

    I hold little hope for the future. There will be no men’s movement. I doubt sometimes the efficacy of the collapse predictions. As one manosphere commenter said, “If you want to know the future, predict a high heel stomping on a testicle for eternity.”

  7. Anonymous says:

    Hi Aurini. I have a question for you: what kind of man has the moral right to create a civilization? I’ve been thinking about what will be required of men once our current moral foundation of egalitarianism collapses. It seems that any civilization requires sacrifices of its people, and I can’t help but feel a bit guilty about it. I’d love to hear your perspective on this.

  8. @Anonymous, I have a perspective to offer on morality. Might makes right and evolutionary winners are the mightiest. Might born of anything not evolution is too weak to compete. Sacrifice? Of its people? Why not sacrifice other people instead? As Aurini said in a video, a nation IS a violent statement (of conquest). I’m looking for equitable synergy among patriarchs. For the gory details, I wrote a series called “Proving Morality.” The view counts indicate my explanation of morality is quite lacking, but it might be fruitfully stimulating for someone of higher than average IQ and sincerity for discernment of fundamental existential truth and its ramifications.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.