Killing the Thirst

Thirst is the mind killer.  Thirst is the vector through which the parasite gets into you, turning you into another zombified pod person.  Ideological purity ain’t worth a damn if you’re enslaved to your lusts; if anything, ideological purity makes it worse, functioning as a hardened shell that allows the wound to fester out of the light and away from fresh air.

Matt Forney writes about this in his latest article, “How Women Subvert Political Movements“.

I’ve seen the exact same pattern play out multiple times over the course of my lifetime and nothing ever changes. A movement/subculture gets some traction, women start flooding in to virtue signal, the men buy it hook, line and sinker, and the whole thing devolves into white-knighting and backstabbing. Years ago, I watched as the manosphere—which once was important enough to merit a hit piece from ABC—was gradually infiltrated by “red pill women” who spent their free time penning fap material for soi-disant alpha males.

Thirsty men are useless men.  At best, they’ll dissipate their energies pursuing mindless hedonism, while exposing themselves to moral and existential risk.  STDs, paternity suits, compromising photographs.  At worst, they’ll fall entirely under the glamour of faux feminine virtue, betraying their brothers and sacrificing the movement for the sake of the crawling back into the conforting world of the womb.

So what is thirst exactly?  How does it differ from the virile instinct?  Vox Day posted a picture that neatly sums this up.

fem boi

Let’s step back from sex for a moment, and consider consumerism.

The core mechanic of Bernays’ method of propagandization is to induce mental illness, and then offer a temporary balm.  He starts out by pointing out your flaws, not to heal them but to exacerbate them.  A good therapist will analyze you and suggest “Perhaps this maladaptive behaviour stems from such and such trauma?  Can we examine this, and work out better solutions?” Bernays, on the other hand, prods at your weak spots to exploit them.  Perhaps your house is somewhat disordered; you lack the respect and admiration of your peers; or you harbour some form of subversive desire.  Rather than focusing on what you have, and what you can do with it – and recognizing the long-term consequences of pursuing perversities – Bernays wants you focusing on what you don’t have.  He wants you feeling envious in the present, and he wants your future to be nothing but a daydream.

He turns reality into a pathology, which can only be cured by the panacea he offers.  It is an internalized form of the Hegellian dialectic; this problem (which we just manufactured by twisting human nature) can only be solved by this object (which existed long before we ‘figured out’ what your problem was).  At its most basic, we have TV commercials from Levis and Mazda; “You aren’t popular!” we’re told – which is true.  Nobody is 100% popular, any more than you can point towards somebody who is 100% tall (and if they’re too tall, they’re not 100% average).  This is normal, it shouldn’t be a problem, but through the marketer’s craft it becomes a problem; a personality flaw.  And the etiology of this flaw?  The underlying pathology that renders you less than 100% popular?  A chemical imbalance in the brain.  In this case, the missing chemical is a new pair of Levis, or a cool Mazda 3.  Return three months later to refill your prescription.

That’s marketing at its most basic; on the deeper level it combines the Eros and Thanatos impulses; self destruction through sex and suicide.  Feel like your life is out of control?  Lose yourself in mindless hedonism.  Mortgage your future through easy credit.  Embrace your debilitating addiction.  This is why suffragettes light up “Freedom Torches”; because God didn’t give them a penis.  This is why men pay for the VIP lounge; because God didn’t give them a wife.

The dialectic of marketing is the dialectic of drugs.  Your life sucks because you have no ambition?  Smoke some weed to further erode that ambition.  You hate yourself because of what you did last night?  Pop some ecstasy so you’ll do something even worse.

This dialectic might have started as propaganda and marketing, but in today’s world it’s become the universal metric.  Politics – both mainstream and alternative – operate on these principles. “Is your life not turning out the way you want it to?  Blame the Jews!  Blame the Whites!  Blame the 1%!”  Thesis and Antithesis start to blur together, and any causative direction is lost.  Black Lives Matter and White Nationalism are wedded at the hip; Feminism and Antifeminism are both equally virulent cults of personality.  The alcoholic gets fired from his job because he shows up drunk; ergo, he goes and buys another drink.

It’s worth considering that in the 1800s our society was awash in alcohol, opium, and cocaine – and we certainly had a lot more health problems as a result of all this – but one thing we didn’t have (at least not to the same extent) was addiction.

Let’s consider that poof in the photo above.  Look at the questions he’s answering: “My favourite place to shop?  My style is?  My biggest fashion mistake?”  I submit that if you have a favourite place to shop, then you stopped being a human being a long time ago.

Thirst is just another one of these addictions.  Whether it’s pornography, the blue scenes on HBO, or merely an advertisement for “Spring Break Mexico Edition!” – it trains you to expect a world of impossible excess; a daydream which can never be realized.

Your present becomes ‘sexual inadequacy’; your future is you becoming a 1 dimensional stud.  Even when you find sexual congress, you don’t enjoy it because the whole time you’re comparing yourself to the image you got from the TV; and it makes no matter whether you’re a PUA hedonist or a Traditional Man looking for a Red Pill Wife.  So long as you’re operating on this dialectic, you’re enslaved to a false promise.

Where did you come from?  Where are you right now?  Where are you going?  Break out of the drug addict’s cycle, the narcissistic world of mirrors, and start living your life.  Because if you aren’t living your life – you’re living somebody else’s.

Leo M.J. Aurini

Trained as a Historian at McMaster University, and as an Infantry soldier in the Canadian Forces, I'm a Scholar, Author, Film Maker, and a God fearing Catholic, who loves women for their illogical nature.

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Atlanta Man says:

    I disagree with you on much of what you write, but you do drive an introspective streak in me. This post was thought provoking, I disagree with some parts, but it is thought provoking.

  2. -A says:

    Great article.

    That man looks like a very gay pedophile. Is this interview for some kind of dating personal? If so, is his favorite woman a single mother with a son between 12 and 16? I wouldn’t be surprised.

    What are the blue scenes on HBO?

    Do you intentionally work with stumbelupon or is that just your web host? Is stumbleupon any good?

  3. Glenfilthie says:

    Oh I dunno Aurini. The sphere was dead in the water the second idiots like Roosh and Vox Day became poster boys for it. Neither of those boys have the intellectual or moral fibre required of men. I laughed like hell at Vox Day when I pointed out that by his own definitions, his own son was a gamma male. As for Roosh? Suing some crazed femcnut that threw a beer in his face? HAR HAR HAR! Buffoons! Mummery! Once those two guys were entrenched in the sphere, the queers, the women and the nutbaggery was bound to follow.

    You, young fella – you’re a different stripe of cat. I remember the early days of the sphere when guys like you were pushing the manly virtues: self improvement. Stoicism. Maintaining a positive attitude in the face of adversity. Staying fit. Captain Capitalism was still a good bet in those days too – but he’s since fallen into bitterness, cynicism and anger.

    The sphere still has merit, provided those virtues remain front and centre at all times.

  4. Thanks AM.

    My apologies -A, I wrote out a response to you a week ago, but apparently it didn’t stick; “blue” scenes means porn-lite.

    Glenfilthie – you’re making some pretty harsh judgments on men without publicists, who are all charting a new course. Lord knows I’ve made more than my fair share of mistakes as well; I try and look at where men are going.

  5. Glenfilthie says:

    Yeah. Hindsight is always 20/20, I suppose.

    But, Davis, look at what those guys are doing today vs what they used to do: back in the day they used to THINK. They had something meaningful to say. They were worth my time and thought. Today, they perform and dance like the organ grinder’s monkey in hopes of a coin in their tin cup. They caper and gibber compete for the spotlight… and that is not charting a course. It’s devolving into poor stand up comedy.

    Just my two cents, your mileage will vary.

  1. July 5, 2016

    […] Killing the Thirst […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.